…And a Few Other Moments from Last Night’s Talk
Davies never did get around to answering this question, although moderator Samia Mehrez—head of the American University in Cairo’s new Center for Translation Studies—did ask during his presentation the AUC last night.
Davies’ list of translated works is, after all, markedly male.
There was nothing sinister about his non-answer answer; after all, it’s hard to keep track of all these six-part questions. He responded instead with an anecdote about an (unnamed) Arab woman writer whose novel he had translated.
This novel, unfortunately, has not seen the light of day. When Davies brought it to the U.S. publisher, he found that the author’s work did not fit said publisher’s idea of “how an Arab woman writer should sound.” After some wrangling, Davies (and, presumably, the author) withdrew the novel.
Davies returned several times to the theme of U.S. and U.K. editors’ expectations of Arab writers. He seemed particularly to point to American editors as having strong notions about just what sort of Arab world their reading public was prepared to buy.
Beyond that, Davies spoke quite entertainingly about the role of a translator—who he likened to an actor interpreting a playwright’s work—and his own translations. The talk was largely theory-free. He even, during the Q&A, got down to the nitty gritty of how a literary translator is paid.
Davies noted that he is not a writer and has never written. But he said that he was “brought up to revere books,” and advised young translators that this—not just competency with language—is core to a translator’s job.
“You have to be a connoisseur of language.”
Mehrez asked about his feelings about the translator’s “invisibility.” Davies said that, in general, he doesn’t mind—and perhaps even appreciates—his quieter role in the process. Still, he said, this appreciation only goes so far. Once he went to speak at a university along with an author he’d translated. He wasn’t expecting to be paid, but noticed that the author received a check.
“I was told that I was not to be paid, because I was, ‘Infinitely less creative.’”
More about Davies: I interviewed him, a while back, for The Quarterly Conversation.












